-
In This Issue: |
|
- Need a Fresh Start on Creativity?
- Authentic Happiness
- Models of Leadership: Food for Thought
|
| Readers' Issues: |
|
Dedicated to helping
you see where you sit,
with respect to your peers, on topical issues.
|
How often do you complete a survey
of your employees?

We were surprised at the results
of last month's survey question.... Over 40% of respondents
said that they never surveyed their employees. Our own experience
would indicate that employee surveys are becoming increasingly
popular as managers seek to gain a deeper understanding
of what's really going on in their organizations.
|
|
-
Vote on This
Month's Issue &
help maximize the value of the results
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Authentic Happiness
by Martin Seligman
At first glance, Authentic Happiness seems a title
more suitable for the self-help section than a newsletter on leadership.
However, if you've ever worked for a truly unhappy leader or tried
to lead team members contaminated by negativity and depression,
you know that it can be a debilitating problem.
Breaking With Traditional Thinking
Seligman takes a 180 degree approach from traditional
psychotherapy, which revolves around a "talking cure" focused
on identifying traumatic events in a person's past, and even on
assigning blame. He introduces the scientifically based idea of
Positive Psychology which focuses on strengths rather than weaknesses.
Building on Individual Strengths
Seligman asserts that happiness is not the result
of good genes or luck but can be cultivated by identifying and
using many of the strengths and traits that individuals already
possess. He says that individuals can call upon their "signature
strengths" such as kindness, originality, humor, optimism, and
generosity to develop natural buffers against misfortune and negative
emotion and to move their lives up to a new, more positive plane.
These signature strengths can be nurtured throughout our lives,
with benefits to our health, relationships, and careers.
Making The Theory Real
To make the theory practical, he provides a Signature
Strengths Survey plus several brief tests to help readers measure
how much positive emotion they experience and determine what their
highest strengths are. Personal anecdotes plus well-documented
studies demonstrate how we can avoid being trapped by the downward
spiral of negativity and depression.
Developing Life Affirming Virtues
Seligman also identifies six virtues and describes
how to strengthen your character in order to develop these life-affirming
virtues:
Maximizing Individual Potential
Authentic Happiness actually gives us a new way
of thinking about individual potential. The life-changing lesson
is that by identifying the very best in ourselves, we can improve
the world around us and achieve new and sustainable levels of
authentic contentment, gratification, and meaning.
Anyone looking to increase happiness in their life
or to maximize their skills as a team leader will certainly find
this book an invaluable reference.
|
If you'd like to purchase Seligman's new book, just click on this
link
Authentic
Happiness to get it from

|
|

|
|
|
|
|
| |
Leadership Perspectives selects
4 or 5 key articles, learning stories & best practices each issue
that offer fresh perspectives & new ideas on dealing with the
challenges of:
- Formulating & communicating vision,
- Developing strategy,
- Motivating & inspiring stakeholders &
team members,
- Discerning future trends, &
- Developing leadership skills
We'd love your
feed back and to hear of any topics you would like to see
addressed.
|
-
-
|
|
|
|
|
To unsubscribe from our mailing list, click
the link at the bottom left of this page. Or simply reply to this
message with the word unsubscribe in the subject line.
©Copyright 2002
All Rights Reserved, Management Transitions Inc
T: (416) 657-2331 --------------- F: (416) 385-9808
www.management-transitions.com
-
|
|
|
Need A Fresh Start On Creativity?
Stanford professor Robert Sutton is a unique
voice with an urgent message about how to generate and capitalize
on new ideas.
We hold these truths to be self-evident: We
recruit people who are quick on the uptake, people whom we like
and need. We encourage coworkers to get along. We make decisions
based on experience. Now flip those assumptions upside down. Hire
slow learners, people whom you dislike and don't need. Encourage
them to defy and fight with their managers and peers. Think of ridiculous
things to do, and do them. 
As management practices go, these sound wrong
-- even weird. According to Robert Sutton, a professor of management
science and engineering at Stanford Engineering School, they're
some of the most powerful practices for generating and capitalizing
on new ideas. "What's weird," says Sutton, "is that people say that
they want innovation, yet they can't depart from their deeply ingrained
beliefs and practices about how to treat people, make decisions,
and structure work."
Don't Get Too Weird Too Fast
Before you start getting weird, there's a major
caveat. During the past several years, we got so frenzied about
innovation that we overstated the notion that innovation is fun
and desirable and that routine work is boring and not as valuable.
A few management gurus who shall remain nameless did a real disservice
to the business world with their exhortations that everyone should
innovate all the time! That's my idea of hell.
The mantra that we have all lived with for the
past five years is, "Innovate or die!" But it's just as accurate
to say, "Innovate and die." All the excitement about all things
new obscured the fact that most new ideas are bad and most old ideas
are good.
The Strange ( But Simple ) Truth About Creativity
The truth is, creativity isn't about wild talent
as much as it's about productivity. To find a few ideas that work,
you need to try a lot that don't. It's a pure numbers game. More
specifically, it's about variance. When innovation is the goal,
organizations need massive variation in what people do, think about,
and produce.
The most creative organizations in any industry
cultivate a vu ja de mentality of seeing old things in new ways.
The ability to keep shifting opinions and perceptions is crucial
to creativity.
Freaks, Geeks, and Fresh Eyes
The best way to bring fresh eyes to any problem is
to bring in new kinds of people. When it comes to innovation, no
one is too weird for the room. It starts with whom and how you hire.
There are a few very effective methods for finding useful misfits
who will increase variance in what people think, say, and do. A
final point about slow learners, loners, and agitators: They only
add value if you surround them with fast learners and managers who
can protect them and translate them to the organization.
Practice Random Acts of Weirdness
When you know that you need to head in a new
direction, but you don't know which road to take, sometimes the
best thing is to do whatever is most ridiculous or random. Thinking
up the dumbest and most impractical things that you can do is a
powerful way to explore your assumptions about the world. When you
get people talking about products, services, and business practices
that they believe are misguided, dumb, or even destructive, it can
help bring the beliefs of the group into broad relief and crystallize
what the company should be doing.
If you want to fill your company with great
ideas, fill it with great people. And that, according to Stanford
professor Robert Sutton, means welcoming weird people. Here are
5 1/2 ways to do it.
Weird Idea #1. Hire
slow learners of the organizational code. Specifically, hire people
with a special kind of stupidity or stubbornness -- who avoid,
ignore, or reject how things are "supposed to be done around here."
Weird Idea #1 1/2. Hire
people who make you uncomfortable.
Weird Idea #2. Hire
people whom you ( probably ) don't need.
Weird Idea #3. Use
job interviews to get new ideas, not just to screen candidates.
Weird Idea #4. Encourage
people to drive you crazy by doing what they think is right rather
than what they are told.
Weird Idea #5.
Find happy people, and let them fight.
Click
here to read the full Fast Company article on Robert Sutton's approach
to creativity.>>
|
| - |
|
|
|
|
Models of Leadership:
Food for Thought
That Was Then
Acceptable approaches to leadership have changed a
lot in the past 100 years. Between 1884 and 1921 when John H. Patterson
built the National Cash Register Co., he used a three-step approach
to employee development. First he would break a man's self-esteem.
Then he would rebuild it from scratch. Then he would fire him. One
NCR executive learned of his dismissal by finding his desk and chair
aflame on the company lawn.
Patterson once appointed a face reader to the company's
board to issue reports on his executives and went so far as to ban
"harmful" foods--bread and butter, tea and coffee, salt and pepper--from
company premises while decreeing the consumption of malted milk
and shredded wheat. He had NCR employees weighed and measured every
six months, and for a while believed in chewing each bite of one's
food 32 times. He poured the contents of executives' desks into
the trash so that they could "start clean" and attributed occult
significance to the number five.
This Is Now
Fast forward to 2002 and we find Motek, a small software
manufacturer in California, whose products are used to track the
movement of goods in warehouses. Everyone at the 11-year-old company
gets five weeks of vacation, plus ten paid holidays. No one is permitted
to work past 5 p.m. or on weekends. Ann Price, Motek's founder,
believes that everyone should be able to walk to work, so she subsidizes
employees' Beverly Hills neighborhood addresses. And after ten years
with the company, workers are given a leased Audi TT, Lexus IS300,
or whatever car they choose within a $6,000 annual limit.
Price, who calls her creation a "capitalist kibbutz,"
has blended cutting-edge business practices, some idiosyncratic
personal beliefs, and a renegade's delight in nonconformity into
a company unlike any other in today's corporate lexicon. Motek's
21 employees vote on everything from the size of their bonuses to
office furnishings. They also choose their own assignments.
Democracy & Disclosure in Action
One of the most fascinating results of Motek's democratic
process involves the company's pay rates and bonuses. Everyone except
the CIO and the sales manager makes one of three salaries at Motek.
One opportunity to improve compensation, by distributing profits,
came at the end of 2000 when Motek moved into the black. But the
employees, who review the company's financial statements quarterly,
decided they'd rather pay down debt than award themselves a bonus.
Security in Honesty
At Motek there is a motto: "Fail sooner; succeed more
often" -- meaning that early knowledge of glitches in the work flow
can help the team direct its time and energy more effectively. That
short-term tactic, in turn, accelerates the pace of a long-term
project.
Rewarding employees for failing sounds about as reasonable
as firing someone for bringing in extra revenue. Price insists that
her employees aren't rewarded for failure but for communicating
about failure. It's a subtle distinction, but it lays bare the key
operating principle at Motek: Smart employees manage themselves
perfectly well if they have complete information.
Forward Into The Future
The question isn't whether this utopian formula can
work; the firm says that it is already profitable and growing fast.
Rather it is how Price is successfully conducting this by-the-people,
for-the-people experiment in management -- and whether it will continue
to work. Growth is the gravest threat to Motek's hothouse experiment
and has already started to strain its democratic operation.
However, Price has devised a strategy that, if all
goes according to plan, will shelter her employees from the growth
that could ravage Motek's culture and eat up profits that might
be distributed to employees.
But if Motek becomes a huge success, it will be because
Price has recognized that promoting trust and autonomy are more
important than even an Audi TT. The world has come a long way since
John Patterson's time.
Click
here to read the full Fortune article on Motek's model.>>
|
|
|
|